Showing posts with label empire. Show all posts
Showing posts with label empire. Show all posts
Thursday, 18 May 2017
Friday, 24 June 2016
The Peaceful Donald
With increasing frequency over the last few months some of the most
thoughtful left and progressive figures have begun to speak favorably of
aspects of Trump’s foreign policy. Let us hear from these heretics.
Labels:
censorship,
education,
empire,
government,
media,
peace,
politics
Friday, 17 June 2016
Murder by Madman Enthusiastically Politicised
The lone witness to allege that the killer of British MP Jo Cox shouted "Britain First!" before and after the murder is himself a member of the rival British National Party. Another witness, a Muslim, denies the statement was uttered. Journalists, politicians, and the pundits of social media proceed with their confidently bigoted denunciation of anyone with any ideas in common with the crazy person.
Labels:
community,
empire,
government,
health,
journalism,
law,
media,
narrative,
politics,
propaganda,
psychology
Tuesday, 14 June 2016
Dalai Lama Neuters The West
A giggling old man employed as a humanitarian mascot thinks that universal secular ethics and common sense will inevitably defeat regressive imperialistic theology rooted in violence and oppression--so there's nothing to worry about. The nice man said so.
Labels:
climate change,
community,
consciousness,
empire,
history,
human rights,
peace,
philosophy,
propaganda,
rationality,
religion,
science
Monday, 30 May 2016
Multipolarity is Orthodox
While the Catholic Pope Francis calls walls unchristian and washes the feet of migrants, the Russian Orthodox Church makes the ethical argument for sovereignty in the face of the financial and cultural pressures of transnational elites.
Labels:
atheism,
community,
conformity,
economics,
empire,
family,
finance,
government,
migration,
narrative,
politics,
propaganda,
religion,
sustainability
Thursday, 26 May 2016
"9/11 Was An Inside Job!" Say Saudis
Almost fifteen years after the event, the terrorist attack on the WTC in New York is still being used by all parties as a political weapon in a dangerous war of words.
Labels:
conspiracy,
economics,
empire,
government,
history,
media,
peace,
politics,
propaganda
Wednesday, 25 May 2016
The Canadian Lückenpresse
If you live in the CBC matrix, you are living in a bubble that will soon
be pricked by reality. A reality that even the CBC cannot hold at bay.
Your trusted information gatekeepers will not be able to stop the truth
from busting through and overwhelming you. The shock will render you
bewildered and paralytic. You will not be able to make sense of what has
befallen you, much in the way that the establishment media pundits are
dumbfounded by Trump's success. How could this happen?
Labels:
community,
complexity,
conformity,
conspiracy,
economics,
empire,
free speech,
government,
journalism,
knowledge,
media,
migration,
narrative,
peace,
politics,
propaganda,
race,
religion
Tuesday, 19 April 2016
Super-Whitey Is The Wizard Behind The Curtain
A professional education consultant speaking at the 17th annual White Privilege Conference in Philadelphia has suggested that teachers must be activists too, working to overcome the racial supremacist narrative of disciplined hard work leading to individual success.
The white imperial gaze must be deconstructed by transgressing against the normative hetero-patriarchal conceptions of goal orientation and proper English. The hierarchical power structure of grading emphasizes traits chosen to favor whites! Students should be assessed not for their individual merits, but rather taught as a class.
Classroom learning and class consciousness must be intimately intertwined, like the hammer and sickle of our mighty banner.
The white imperial gaze must be deconstructed by transgressing against the normative hetero-patriarchal conceptions of goal orientation and proper English. The hierarchical power structure of grading emphasizes traits chosen to favor whites! Students should be assessed not for their individual merits, but rather taught as a class.
Classroom learning and class consciousness must be intimately intertwined, like the hammer and sickle of our mighty banner.
Wednesday, 16 December 2015
The Road to Galactic Serfdom
Shortly after 9/11, Vice President Dick Cheney said on television, “We
also have to work, though, sort of the dark side, if you will.” And,
stricken with terror and indulging in hate, America did embrace the dark
side, accepting torture, indefinite detention, warrantless
surveillance, assassination, perpetual illegal wars, and mass civilian
casualties.
Labels:
economics,
empire,
fascism,
film,
government,
history,
peace,
philosophy,
propaganda
Sunday, 13 December 2015
Neocons' Aggression Towards Sovereign States Destroying Earth
Neocons are the unhumans who created on purpose the "war against terror"
in order to gain a weapon against Russia and China. You can witness
these unhumans every day on talk TV and read them in the Weekly
Standard, National Review, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times,
the British, German, Australian, Canadian, and endless Western
newspapers.
Saturday, 12 December 2015
Hijrah and Jihad
Yes, there is a multicultural community being manufactured here, and it
is benefiting these global mega-corporations and the international
financial institutions that fund them. Europe and the U.S. as we know
them have served their purpose, but the ideals that many in these
nations still hold onto are a barrier to global corporate power, so they
must be “replaced” by people who are accustomed to living under tyranny
and less attached to real liberty.
Wednesday, 9 December 2015
Wholesale lies and deception from Obama in his televised speech to America on terrorism
By diabolical design through its divide and conquer strategy the ruling elite has set up its Trojan horse
now being unleashed throughout both Europe and North America to
purposely foment civil unrest, violence including terrorism as well as
class, racial and religious warfare. That's why when Obama and
other Western politicians piously preach their pie in the sky ideals of
tolerance and acceptance under the benign guise of multiculturalism,
the elite's puppets are actually fulfilling their demonic, treasonous
role to destroy America and Europe from within by willfully betraying
the very oaths they took to protect their citizens from both foreign and
domestic enemies.
Labels:
academia,
community,
conspiracy,
economics,
empire,
free speech,
government,
history,
human rights,
journalism,
law,
migration,
morality,
narrative,
peace,
politics,
propaganda,
religion
Will Syria Repeat the Fate of Libya, ‘Which No Longer Exists’?
“During the NATO bombardment of Libya, western media conveniently forgot
to mention that the United Nations had just prepared a lengthy dossier
praising Mr. Gaddafi’s human rights achievements."
Labels:
economics,
education,
empire,
government,
human rights,
media,
peace,
politics
Thursday, 3 December 2015
Is yoga culturally oppressive? That’s a stretch
Fortunately, according to Ms. Kuo, these issues do not apply to European
food – only to food created by non-white people. Which means that
anyone can appropriate the cuisine of my forebears – sauerkraut and
haggis, mainly – to their heart’s content. Not that anyone would want
to.
Saturday, 28 November 2015
Israeli Colonel Caught with IS Pants Down
It’s becoming increasingly clear that at least a faction in the Obama
Administration has played a very dirty behind-the-scenes role in
supporting IS in order to advance the removal of Syrian President Bashar
al Assad and pave the way for what inevitably would be a Libya-style
chaos and destruction which would make the present Syrian refugee crisis
in Europe a mere warmup by comparison.
Labels:
economics,
empire,
government,
migration,
peace,
politics,
propaganda
Tuesday, 17 November 2015
A letter to friends
Learned and freethinking gentlemen,
Sorry I haven't been in touch. I took some time away from Maddingcrowdbook in order to hear myself think. The herd found me anyway. Even in the mountains I can hear them move.
Here's something of where I've uncomfortably been for the last few months. I promise I'm not coming from a place of racism, sexism, or (worst of all) conservatism, but--
~~~
I read Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique. He suggests that evolutionary psychology can clarify the unconscious motivations of certain ideologues, with a certain persistent tribal identification, who assert that healthy Western cultural norms are secretly pathological.
There are good historical reasons for Jews to have led the argument in favour of multiculturalism, and against European ethnic hegemony.
This means that there actually is an internal coherence and logic to my education in the denigration of Western civilisation (post-structuralism, deconstruction, critical theory, et cetera). It's not just that it was frustratingly mystical and pretentious; it was wrong, and it was wrong for reasons.
A little psychology and history applied to my lessons makes them appear less like a misanthropic shit test. This recasts my failure to engage in the bad faith performance necessary for my final papers. Of course I couldn't get my Honours! The field of cultural studies wasn't honourable!
The reasons for that are understandable, and not at all a conscious conspiracy by scheming Jews to undermine our culture, but the whole tenor of my studies is rendered suddenly comprehensible by this transgressive observation--that a significant portion of the people I read in university were Jewish atheists who believed in the moral exceptionalism of the Jewish people.
~~~
So I've just read in MacDonald's book--about academic theory--that immigration policies in the West were changed in the 60s and 70s against popular sentiment, and not by elected politicians, but by government officials responding to lobby groups. Canada quietly abandoned a policy of favouring immigration from the cultures that constituted it because that's what it had to do to play ball with the UN. It was not a democratic decision.
All of this is swirling around my head, when the biggest migration since the last world war breaks into the news, and browbeaten Swedes and Germans scramble to welcome refugees who have crossed half a dozen safe countries to get there. What am I to make of this?
~~~
More conscious of the origins of intersectional grievance politics, I take a closer look at the works of people who got degrees like mine, but actually believed them. Gamergate, Shirtgate, Elevatorgate; each time the media just repeated what professional victims said about the oppressive patriarchy. That kind of talk is grounded in opaque poetical political philosophising, not any kind of science.
They have not one, but two Jewish prophets: Marx and Freud. It's inevitable that the oppressed female proletariat will throw off the shackles of those bourgeois boys with all their unfair power. It's clear that white people repress how hateful and unbalanced they really are (just like all men want to fuck their mothers) and your vehement denials really just prove how deeply true it is.
This is old stuff, adapted and polished for a new age, but people live and breathe it as gospel truth -- and they know the god they don't believe in is on their side.
~~~
Where have I heard this before? But of course!
This is the "ressentiment" of slave morality. Nietzsche was talking about Judaism by way of Christianity, but the psychological calculus tracks perfectly.
Resentment of the powerful leads to a reversal of values whereby the weak and powerless turn their lack of power into a virtue. Where the nobles before called the things that were not great "bad," the slaves now call the things that are great "evil." Where "goodness" before was a sense of strength and health and the power to effect one's will in the world, "goodness" in slave morality glorifies being a victim.
Nietzsche was writing about Social Justice Warriors in the fucking 1880s!
~~~
In the service of this narrative of oppression, regressive progressives have abandoned any pretense of classically liberal values. The academy and the wider public discourse have become actively hostile to the free expression of ideas, to say nothing of facts and reason. What passes for moral and rational is frequently a barrage of ad hominem, ab absurdo, straw man, and reductio ad Hitlerum arguments.
People think that repeating the received dogma is what constitutes thinking. How can I be surprised? Other than the philosophy courses I took, that was the measure of success in my seminars.
Universities are not about reading widely and learning how to assess information, the media is not about objectively reporting the facts and showing all sides, politics is not about defending the interests of the people and the land, and the agora, the marketplace of ideas, has been reduced to the exchange of instinctive feelings, recycled reasons, and decadent distractions. 2500 years of intellectual, political, scientific, and moral development have earned us the privilege of not simply neglecting those gifts, but denying their value.
Franz Boas said that cultures are relative and can't be compared, which our radicals have taken to mean that only our culture can be criticised, and certainly not praised. And why bother cultivating an elevated sense of possibility, if nothing we could ever accomplish would be any better than savagery?
Maybe the epidemics of mental illness and addiction and suicide in our society have something to do with the consequences of not honouring our ancestors (something codified as a religious rite by some cultures, but perhaps developing from a naïve psychological instinct for health). We're the culture that chose to end institutional sexism, to end the most obvious forms of colonialism, to end legal slavery, and instead of pride for our self-overcoming, we accept the blame for inventing these injustices, reversing our accomplishments into a listless and demented ethnomasochism.
~~~
And then...
Those people didn't choose to bomb Syria. They didn't colonise Algeria. They didn't deserve it. So why are some people--my father, for one--seemingly more interested in understanding and defending the motivations of jihadists than in deploring a dangerous ideology?
No amount of cultural relativism makes it not wrong. Of course we shouldn't meddle with other regions. Of course our nations have done terrible things in our name. It's still wrong. There's no moral equivalency that can absolve terrorism. It's wrong without the need for a song and dance to lend context and nuance. That's my culture.
If the people who value liberty, equality and fraternity can be gunned down for peacefully enjoying their way of life, and they shrug and say they probably deserved it, what competition can we hope to muster against a theocratic religion still in its petulant teenage years?
~~~
In Missouri, where the president of the state university was forced to resign after someone made a swastika out of poo, activists began using the hashtag #FuckParis, because those Parisians don't understand the institutional oppression of a townie driving by and shouting the n-word.
In Peterborough, the city where I got my schooling in what turned out to be cultural Marxism, someone set fire to the only mosque.
Sorry I haven't been in touch. I took some time away from Maddingcrowdbook in order to hear myself think. The herd found me anyway. Even in the mountains I can hear them move.
Here's something of where I've uncomfortably been for the last few months. I promise I'm not coming from a place of racism, sexism, or (worst of all) conservatism, but--
~~~
I read Kevin MacDonald's The Culture of Critique. He suggests that evolutionary psychology can clarify the unconscious motivations of certain ideologues, with a certain persistent tribal identification, who assert that healthy Western cultural norms are secretly pathological.
There are good historical reasons for Jews to have led the argument in favour of multiculturalism, and against European ethnic hegemony.
This means that there actually is an internal coherence and logic to my education in the denigration of Western civilisation (post-structuralism, deconstruction, critical theory, et cetera). It's not just that it was frustratingly mystical and pretentious; it was wrong, and it was wrong for reasons.
A little psychology and history applied to my lessons makes them appear less like a misanthropic shit test. This recasts my failure to engage in the bad faith performance necessary for my final papers. Of course I couldn't get my Honours! The field of cultural studies wasn't honourable!
The reasons for that are understandable, and not at all a conscious conspiracy by scheming Jews to undermine our culture, but the whole tenor of my studies is rendered suddenly comprehensible by this transgressive observation--that a significant portion of the people I read in university were Jewish atheists who believed in the moral exceptionalism of the Jewish people.
~~~
So I've just read in MacDonald's book--about academic theory--that immigration policies in the West were changed in the 60s and 70s against popular sentiment, and not by elected politicians, but by government officials responding to lobby groups. Canada quietly abandoned a policy of favouring immigration from the cultures that constituted it because that's what it had to do to play ball with the UN. It was not a democratic decision.
All of this is swirling around my head, when the biggest migration since the last world war breaks into the news, and browbeaten Swedes and Germans scramble to welcome refugees who have crossed half a dozen safe countries to get there. What am I to make of this?
~~~
More conscious of the origins of intersectional grievance politics, I take a closer look at the works of people who got degrees like mine, but actually believed them. Gamergate, Shirtgate, Elevatorgate; each time the media just repeated what professional victims said about the oppressive patriarchy. That kind of talk is grounded in opaque poetical political philosophising, not any kind of science.
They have not one, but two Jewish prophets: Marx and Freud. It's inevitable that the oppressed female proletariat will throw off the shackles of those bourgeois boys with all their unfair power. It's clear that white people repress how hateful and unbalanced they really are (just like all men want to fuck their mothers) and your vehement denials really just prove how deeply true it is.
This is old stuff, adapted and polished for a new age, but people live and breathe it as gospel truth -- and they know the god they don't believe in is on their side.
~~~
Where have I heard this before? But of course!
This is the "ressentiment" of slave morality. Nietzsche was talking about Judaism by way of Christianity, but the psychological calculus tracks perfectly.
Resentment of the powerful leads to a reversal of values whereby the weak and powerless turn their lack of power into a virtue. Where the nobles before called the things that were not great "bad," the slaves now call the things that are great "evil." Where "goodness" before was a sense of strength and health and the power to effect one's will in the world, "goodness" in slave morality glorifies being a victim.
Nietzsche was writing about Social Justice Warriors in the fucking 1880s!
~~~
In the service of this narrative of oppression, regressive progressives have abandoned any pretense of classically liberal values. The academy and the wider public discourse have become actively hostile to the free expression of ideas, to say nothing of facts and reason. What passes for moral and rational is frequently a barrage of ad hominem, ab absurdo, straw man, and reductio ad Hitlerum arguments.
People think that repeating the received dogma is what constitutes thinking. How can I be surprised? Other than the philosophy courses I took, that was the measure of success in my seminars.
Universities are not about reading widely and learning how to assess information, the media is not about objectively reporting the facts and showing all sides, politics is not about defending the interests of the people and the land, and the agora, the marketplace of ideas, has been reduced to the exchange of instinctive feelings, recycled reasons, and decadent distractions. 2500 years of intellectual, political, scientific, and moral development have earned us the privilege of not simply neglecting those gifts, but denying their value.
Franz Boas said that cultures are relative and can't be compared, which our radicals have taken to mean that only our culture can be criticised, and certainly not praised. And why bother cultivating an elevated sense of possibility, if nothing we could ever accomplish would be any better than savagery?
Maybe the epidemics of mental illness and addiction and suicide in our society have something to do with the consequences of not honouring our ancestors (something codified as a religious rite by some cultures, but perhaps developing from a naïve psychological instinct for health). We're the culture that chose to end institutional sexism, to end the most obvious forms of colonialism, to end legal slavery, and instead of pride for our self-overcoming, we accept the blame for inventing these injustices, reversing our accomplishments into a listless and demented ethnomasochism.
~~~
And then...
Those people didn't choose to bomb Syria. They didn't colonise Algeria. They didn't deserve it. So why are some people--my father, for one--seemingly more interested in understanding and defending the motivations of jihadists than in deploring a dangerous ideology?
No amount of cultural relativism makes it not wrong. Of course we shouldn't meddle with other regions. Of course our nations have done terrible things in our name. It's still wrong. There's no moral equivalency that can absolve terrorism. It's wrong without the need for a song and dance to lend context and nuance. That's my culture.
If the people who value liberty, equality and fraternity can be gunned down for peacefully enjoying their way of life, and they shrug and say they probably deserved it, what competition can we hope to muster against a theocratic religion still in its petulant teenage years?
~~~
In Missouri, where the president of the state university was forced to resign after someone made a swastika out of poo, activists began using the hashtag #FuckParis, because those Parisians don't understand the institutional oppression of a townie driving by and shouting the n-word.
In Peterborough, the city where I got my schooling in what turned out to be cultural Marxism, someone set fire to the only mosque.
Labels:
academia,
anthropology,
community,
conformity,
empire,
eschatology,
evolution,
free speech,
government,
history,
media,
migration,
morality,
narrative,
peace,
philosophy,
psychology,
race,
religion,
synchronicity
Monday, 9 November 2015
Five Leaders Challenging Western Imperialism Through Diplomacy, Persuasion And Public Pressure
From widely divergent origins and diverse ideological backgrounds, five
political leaders have set a new agenda for dealing with war and peace,
equality and inequality, security and terrorism and environmental
protection. Except for Jeremy Corbyn, who in any case will probably be
rendered impotent by his own party’s elite, none of these progressive leaders’ ideologies is derived from the secular left.
Labels:
climate change,
economics,
empire,
government,
human rights,
peace,
politics,
religion
Tuesday, 3 November 2015
Ban Ki-moon condemns US position on Syria, endorses Putin
Suckers in the West fall for the Western aristocracies' line that Putin
and not Obama is wrong on this and is the cause of the dragged-out
Syrian war. Such fools don't even ask themselves whether in this dispute
it is Obama, or instead Putin, who is supporting the most basic
democratic principle of self-rule by the people. But the average
individual is that manipulable: so manipulable as to think that black is
white, and white is black; that good is bad, and bad is good. Totally
manipulable.
Labels:
absurdity,
empire,
government,
journalism,
law,
media,
peace,
politics
Friday, 16 October 2015
Canadian Election 2015: Telling the truth costs political candidates their nomination
Regardless of which of the three main political parties in Canada a person belongs to, any
prospective political candidate that chooses to tell the truth about controversial subjects like Israel or 9/11 may quickly find themselves
out of a job.
Labels:
empire,
free speech,
government,
politics,
propaganda,
religion
Wednesday, 7 October 2015
That Awkward Moment When One Nobel Peace Prize Winner Bombs Another
Doctors Without Borders won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1999. President
Obama was awarded his in 2009. As Commander-in-Chief of the military
that bombed the Doctors Without Borders hospital, this makes Obama
perhaps the first Nobel Peace Prize winner to bomb another Nobel Peace
Prize winner.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)